Warning
Info
Warning
Info
Simple English definitions for legal terms
successive-writ doctrine
Read a random definition: res non est integra
A quick definition of successive-writ doctrine:
The successive-writ doctrine is a rule in criminal procedure that says a person cannot file a second or additional request for a writ of habeas corpus that raises issues that were already decided in a previous request. This means that if a person has already made a claim in a previous writ, they cannot bring it up again in a new one. This is different from the abuse-of-the-writ doctrine, which is when a person files multiple writs with the intention of harassing or delaying the legal process.
A more thorough explanation:
The successive-writ doctrine is a principle in criminal procedure that states that a second or supplemental petition for a writ of habeas corpus cannot raise claims that were already heard and decided on the merits in a previous petition.
For example, if a person files a writ of habeas corpus claiming that their imprisonment is unlawful because of a violation of their constitutional rights, and the court denies the petition after considering the merits of the claim, the person cannot file another writ of habeas corpus raising the same claim again. This is because the successive-writ doctrine prohibits raising claims that have already been decided on the merits in a previous petition.
The purpose of the successive-writ doctrine is to prevent abuse of the writ of habeas corpus, which is a legal remedy that allows individuals to challenge their detention or imprisonment. By limiting the number of times a person can file a writ of habeas corpus on the same claim, the successive-writ doctrine ensures that the writ is used appropriately and not as a means of harassment or delay.