A more thorough explanation:

A special verdict is a type of verdict in a court case where the jury gives its findings on factual issues in the case, without necessarily stating which party should win. The judge decides what questions the jury should answer, and the judge can draw legal implications from the jury's answers. This type of verdict can provide many benefits in a complex case, especially if one party appeals the judgment.

In a personal injury case, the jury may be asked to answer specific questions about the accident, such as who was at fault and what injuries were sustained. The jury's answers to these questions would be used by the judge to determine the outcome of the case. For example, if the jury finds that the defendant was at fault and the plaintiff suffered significant injuries, the judge may award damages to the plaintiff.

Another example could be in a contract dispute case, where the jury is asked to determine whether a contract was breached and what damages were incurred as a result. The judge would then use the jury's findings to determine the appropriate remedy, such as awarding damages or requiring specific performance of the contract.

Overall, a special verdict allows the jury to focus on the factual issues of the case, while leaving the legal implications to the judge. This can help ensure a fair and just outcome in complex cases.