!-- Google Tag Manager (noscript) -->

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

rex non potest peccare

Read a random definition: writ of ejectment

A quick definition of rex non potest peccare:

Term: rex non potest peccare

Definition: Rex non potest peccare is a fancy way of saying "the king can do no wrong." This means that the king, or the government, cannot be sued for doing something wrong without their permission. This is called sovereign immunity. In the United States, this applies to the federal and state governments, but not to cities. However, the government can choose to let people sue them if they want to.

A more thorough explanation:

rex non potest peccare

Rex non potest peccare is a Latin legal maxim that means "the king can do no wrong." This principle developed into the doctrine of sovereign immunity, which is also known as governmental immunity. The idea behind this principle is that the king, or sovereign, cannot commit a legal wrong. The doctrine of sovereign immunity prevents sovereigns, including the government or its branches, departments, and agencies, from being sued without their consent.

In the United States, sovereign immunity applies to federal and state governments, but not to municipalities. However, federal and state governments have the right to waive their sovereign immunity.

An example of rex non potest peccare in action is when a citizen tries to sue the government for damages caused by a government employee. If the government does not give its consent to be sued, the case will be dismissed due to sovereign immunity.

Another example is when a state government is sued for violating a citizen's constitutional rights. If the state government does not waive its sovereign immunity, the case will be dismissed.

These examples illustrate how the principle of rex non potest peccare has evolved into the doctrine of sovereign immunity, which protects the government from being sued without its consent.

Revolving credit facility | Reynolds v. Sims (1964)

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
๐Ÿ‘ Chat vibe: 0 ๐Ÿ‘Ž
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.