Warning
Info
Warning
Info
Simple English definitions for legal terms
optional completeness, rule of
Read a random definition: bill of attainder
A quick definition of optional completeness, rule of:
Optional Completeness, Rule of: When someone shows part of a writing or says part of something in court, the other side can ask for the rest of it to be read or said too. This is so everyone can understand the whole thing and not just part of it. However, the rest of it can only be read or said if it helps explain the first part and is not unfair or confusing. This rule applies to many types of things, like conversations and written records, but some places have different rules.
A more thorough explanation:
The Optional Completeness, Rule of is an evidentiary rule that states when a party introduces part of a writing or an utterance at trial, the opposing party may require that the remainder of the passage be read to establish the full context.
For example, if a witness testifies about a conversation they had with someone, the opposing party can request that the entire conversation be read or played to the court to provide a complete understanding of the context.
However, there are limitations to this rule. The remainder of the passage must explain the first part, and it cannot be received if it is irrelevant. In most jurisdictions, the remainder is admissible unless its admission would be unfair or misleading.
The rule of optional completeness applies to various types of writings, including account books, conversations, confessions, and opponent's admissions. However, the Federal Rules of Evidence limit the rule to writings and recorded statements.
Overall, the rule of optional completeness ensures that the court has a complete understanding of the context of the evidence presented, which is essential in making a fair and just decision.