A more thorough explanation:

A contradictory judgment is a legal term that refers to a situation where two or more judgments are given in a case that contradict each other. This can happen when different judges or courts give different rulings on the same issue, or when a judge's ruling contradicts their own previous ruling.

For example, in a divorce case, one judge may rule that the husband should have custody of the children, while another judge may rule that the wife should have custody. This creates a contradictory judgment, as both rulings cannot be followed at the same time.

A contradictory motion is a legal term that refers to a motion filed by one party in a case that contradicts a previous motion filed by the same party. This can happen when a party changes their position on an issue or presents new evidence that contradicts their previous argument.

For example, in a personal injury case, the plaintiff may file a motion claiming that the defendant was responsible for their injuries. Later, the plaintiff may file a contradictory motion claiming that they were actually responsible for their own injuries. This creates a contradictory motion, as the plaintiff's two motions cannot both be true at the same time.

These examples illustrate how contradictory judgments and motions can create confusion and uncertainty in legal proceedings. It is important for judges and parties to carefully consider their arguments and evidence to avoid contradictory rulings and motions.