Warning
Info
Warning
Info
Simple English definitions for legal terms
comparison signal
Read a random definition: liber niger
A quick definition of comparison signal:
A comparison signal is a tool used in legal writing to encourage the reader to compare two or more sources. This helps to support or clarify the author's statements. The signal is written as "Compare [source 1] with [source 2]" or "Compare [source 1] and [source 2] with [source 3] and [source 4]." For example, "Circuits were split on the issue of whether the SCOTUS decision of Crawford v. Washington applies retroactively to previous convictions or not. Compare Bockting v. Bayer, 399 F.3d 1010 (9th Cir. 2005) with Mungo v. Duncan, 393 F.3d 327 (2d Cir. 2004)." By comparing the sources, the reader can understand that different circuits had different opinions on the issue.
A more thorough explanation:
A comparison signal, also known as a compare with signal, is a signal used in legal writing to encourage the reader to compare at least two cited sources. The purpose of comparing the sources is to either support or clarify the author's preceding statements.
Here is an example of how to use a comparison signal:
Compare [source 1] with [source 2].
Or, with more sources on each side of the comparison:
Compare [source 1] and [source 2] with [source 3] and [source 4].
For instance, in a legal brief or decision statement, one might write:
"Circuits were split on the issue of whether the SCOTUS decision of Crawford v. Washington applies retroactively to previous convictions or not. Compare Bockting v. Bayer, 399 F.3d 1010 (9th Cir. 2005) with Mungo v. Duncan, 393 F.3d 327 (2d Cir. 2004)."
In this example, the comparison signal is used to show that different circuits disagreed over the issue of retroactively applying the decision of Crawford.