A more thorough explanation:

Color, in a legal sense, refers to the way something appears, rather than what it actually is. For example, the term "color of law" refers to the appearance of legal authority or a legal right, even if that authority or right does not actually exist.

• Color of law: A police officer who uses excessive force against a suspect may claim to be acting under the "color of law," meaning that they were using their legal authority to make an arrest. However, if the force used was not justified by the situation, the officer may be held accountable for their actions.
• Color of title: A person who claims to own a piece of property based on a faulty or incomplete title may be said to have a "color of title." This means that they appear to have legal ownership of the property, but their claim may not hold up in court.
• Colorable claim: A claim that appears to have legal merit, but is actually based on false or misleading information, is said to be "colorable." For example, a person who sues their employer for discrimination based on a minor issue may have a colorable claim, even if their case is ultimately dismissed.
• Colorable transaction: A transaction that appears to be legitimate, but is actually a cover for illegal activity, is called a "colorable transaction." For instance, a business that claims to be selling legitimate products, but is actually a front for a money laundering operation, may be engaging in a colorable transaction.

These examples illustrate how the term "color" is used in a legal context to describe situations where something appears to be legal or legitimate, but is actually not. This can be a way for people to abuse their power or deceive others, and it is important for the legal system to be able to distinguish between what is truly legal and what is only a "color" of legality.