!-- Google Tag Manager (noscript) -->

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

business judgment rule

Read a random definition: senior partner

A quick definition of business judgment rule:

The business judgment rule is a protection for directors of a corporation. It means that as long as the director acted in good faith, with care, and in the best interest of the corporation, they cannot be held liable for violating their duty of care. This rule is a presumption in favor of the board, but it can be defeated if the director acted in gross negligence or bad faith, or had a conflict of interest. If the court finds that the rule applies, the burden of proof shifts to the plaintiff to prove otherwise. If the rule does not apply, the burden shifts to the board to prove that the transaction was fair.

A more thorough explanation:

The business judgment rule is a legal principle that provides protection to directors of a corporation from liability when they are sued for violating their duty of care to the corporation. This rule applies when the director's actions are made in good faith, with reasonable care, and with the belief that they are acting in the best interests of the corporation.

For example, if a director of a company decides to invest in a new product line, and the investment turns out to be unsuccessful, the director may be sued for violating their duty of care. However, if the director made the decision in good faith, with reasonable care, and with the belief that it was in the best interests of the corporation, the business judgment rule would protect them from liability.

The business judgment rule is a presumption in favor of the board, which means that courts will generally uphold the decisions of directors unless there is evidence of gross negligence, bad faith, or a conflict of interest. If the plaintiff can prove any of these factors, the court will not uphold the business judgment rule.

When the corporation pleads the business judgment rule, the burden of proof shifts to the plaintiff to prove that the rule does not apply. However, if the court finds that the rule does not apply, the burden shifts to the board to prove that the process and substance of the transaction was fair.

business invitee | business license

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
๐Ÿ‘ Chat vibe: 0 ๐Ÿ‘Ž
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.