A more thorough explanation:

The Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals is a board that reviews appeals from final decisions of contracting officers. These appeals involve disputes relating to contracts made by elements of the Department of Defense and designated civilian agencies. The board is quasi-judicial, which means it has some of the powers of a court, but is not a full court. Its decisions are subject to judicial review, which means they can be reviewed by a higher court.

An example of a case that might be heard by the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals is a dispute between a contractor and the Department of Defense over the terms of a contract. If the contracting officer makes a final decision that the contractor disagrees with, the contractor can appeal to the board. The board will review the case and make a decision, which can be reviewed by a higher court if necessary.

Another example might be a dispute over payment for services rendered. If a contractor believes they have not been paid the full amount they are owed, they can appeal to the board. The board will review the case and make a decision based on the terms of the contract and any other relevant factors.

These examples illustrate how the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals functions as a quasi-judicial board that reviews appeals from final decisions of contracting officers. The board has the power to make decisions based on the terms of the contract and other relevant factors, and its decisions can be reviewed by a higher court if necessary.